Columbus, Ohio
Ohio Supreme Court Justice Alice Robie Resnick admitted to an Ohio Highway Patrol sergeant that she had indeed had something to drink before she was pulled over Monday afternoon for driving under the influence.
Indeed she did. Despite the qualifing and all too dismissive “something,” – she blew a 0.216 – more than twice the legal limit for driving while intoxicated.
“I’m hoping you show up 000,” Sergeant Stidham said as he prepared to give her the portable test, the results of which are not admissible in court.
“I won’t,” she said. “I won’t. I won’t. I did have something to drink. I don’t know if I had. . . .”
Sergeant Stidham: “How long ago was that, do you think?”
Justice Resnick: “I don’t know.”
Sergeant Stidham: “I mean, a couple of hours?”
Justice Resnick: “I’m just really upset.”
Later, after seeing the results, she said, “Well, I don’t believe that.”
Sergeant. Stidham: “You’re showing a 0.216.”
Justice Resnick: “My God.”
Sergeant Stidham: “That’s well over double what you’re allowed to have.”
Justice Resnick: “I can’t believe that. I don’t believe that test. Do you have another test that I can take?”
“Well yes there is” – the officer should have said – “it’s the one you take just after the female drunk tank in-proccessing officer says, ‘lift your robes and smile.'”
“I am tired,” she first told the sergeant. “I have a mother-in-law who’s 97 and has been in the hospital. I was taking care of her. I have a husband who is on dialysis, and I have got to get to Columbus. I have not been drinking, I will be very careful if you just let me go.”
You can almost sympathize with this poor woman, almost. But then she pulls the ultimate “it’s true, it’s true” moment by blaming the entire episode on some type of EVIIIL Karl Rovian plot: “I’m the only Democrat on the court, and you’re forcing me to retire.”
Yes, just like they forced you to suck down “something” til you were incoherently stupid.
H/T “Briney.”
Cross posted @ On the Third Hand.
UPDATE: Talk Left has noted this story and takes the predicable line, “This is being overblown. Give the woman some privacy. She wasn’t drinking on the bench.”
No she wasn’t, but there is a strong suspicion why she refused to take the mandated breath or blood test and lost her license for a year. She was drunk as a skunk on MD 20/20 and thought her “robes” would save the day. With no hard evidence she could plead no contest, walk away with no convection on the record and go about her daily business.
And to prove that some people actually reside in “outer space” (and that it is of the unintelligent variety) “TChris” provides this nugget of wisdom in the threads first comment.
“This is the most commonly committed crime and, MADD propoganda notwithstanding, should not be treated as a crime when the driver has not caused actual harm.”
Must be a lawyer and is familiar with the “no harm, no foul” defense. One note in the thread, that I frankly didn’t catch. The reported .216 she blew is wildly out of wack and a valid point of discussion.
As far as I’m concerned she hangs herself when she expresses disbelief in the field test: “I can’t believe that. I don’t believe that test. Do you have another test that I can take?”
Then refuses the court admissible test at the Cop Shop. Guilty, “do not pass go, do not collect $200 dollars, go directly to jail.”
UPDATE II: Joe Kelly (For the Sake of Argument) notes a Washington Times article that clears up the issue of her BAC obtained during the field test. She blew a 0.22%, three times the legal limit.
Read Full Post »